tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-275573272011-12-14T18:44:31.336-08:00Guidenoreply@blogger.comBlogger31100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27557327.post-1154922029817303202003-10-07T20:39:00.000-07:002006-08-06T20:40:29.816-07:00

I read this article with some interest, in that many of those "theocons" I agreed with on the war with Iraq (except on the issue of it's our duty to give people "democracy.") Of course, I was labeled a neo-conservative by many of my traditionalist friends, and there was some very interesting debates on the issue, especially with fellow team member Michael Brendan Dougherty.Yet here's something

Guidenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27557327.post-1154921908224237152003-10-07T20:37:00.000-07:002006-08-06T20:38:43.123-07:00

L.A. Archdiocese blasts American Life LeagueEven the Neo-Catholics must be getting sick of Mahony. In responding to John Pacheco, Thomas Woods made a very interesting point, that the debate should be about whether men such as Mahony are truly in the church, rather than traditionalists. Well Mahony's marauders have struck again, this time against a pro-life organization.The organization wrote a

Guidenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27557327.post-1154921788354128162003-10-07T20:10:00.000-07:002006-08-06T20:36:28.366-07:00

Ratzinger on John Paul I's electionA few interesting things. First, he notes just how healthy John Paul I was at the time of his mysterious death. While not a big fan of Conspiracy Theories, something is quite amiss in regards to the smiling Pontiff's death, and it is sorta wierd. Yet we won't go into that.Ratzinger then talks about how he viewed John Paul I as a saint, because of his holiness.Of

Guidenoreply@blogger.com